Trokair Posted September 19, 2014 Share Posted September 19, 2014 The Blessing of the Omnissiah rule says to add one to the dice roll for each Servitor with a servo-arm in the unit. So if I have a unit of 5 servitors; am I correct in thinking that the roll will always succeed. What about if I have a unit of 5 Servitors joined by two or more Techpriest/Marine. Each Techpriest/Marine gets to make its own Blessing of the Omnissiah roll when attempting to repair a vehicle. Do they both get the plus 5 from the servitors on their roll, or can only one of the Techpriest/Marines get the benefit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dam13n Posted September 19, 2014 Share Posted September 19, 2014 1 - Yes, it becomes an auto-succeed. 2 - They both get the benefit from having the Servitors in their unit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trokair Posted September 20, 2014 Author Share Posted September 20, 2014 Thank you very much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acebaur Posted September 21, 2014 Share Posted September 21, 2014 Doesn't the rulebook say that a 1 is always a failure? Or did they take that part out of the new edition? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolemai Posted September 21, 2014 Share Posted September 21, 2014 On a characteristic test, yes. However, this is not one of those. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axagoras Posted September 21, 2014 Share Posted September 21, 2014 on a characteristic test a 1 auto passes and a 6 auto fails... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BassWave Posted September 27, 2014 Share Posted September 27, 2014 Characteristic tests such as Ws, Bs, and saves of any kind always fail on a 1. Toughness, initiative, and strength tests auto fail on a 6. BotO uses none of these, so it is possible to auto succeed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.