Jump to content

Effective use of breachers


Wolf Lord Loki

Recommended Posts

True, but why would you not use phosphex when shooting at breachers? :P

Because of... reasons. ;)

 

 

Not everyone takes Phosphex.

Me, for example. As an Iron Warriors player just don't need it to succeed.

And it kills marines units in your Meta if everyone takes Phosphex, which is even worse then just being op.

Big units of marines where one of the main reasons I started with HH so I won't use stuff which erase them from my gaming group.

It is effective though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True, but why would you not use phosphex when shooting at breachers? tongue.png

Because despite the popular belief, phosphex isn't the cheese with which you win every game, and therefore not everyone has the desire to buy that siege breaker and the phosphex canisters.

More often than not, in my local gaming group, rapiers are often fielded with just frag and shatter shells. And in that kind of environment, Breachers are good with their rerollable armor saves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand that, definitely true. Though in this case we have someone using a sub-par unit against a unit not being used to it's max efficiency. Not that it's a bad thing! Just a thought that popped into my head.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the topic of ultramarine breachers with power swords, I struggle to see a use for them considering how much better suzerians are. Both units pretty much fulfill the same role yet suzerians do it so much better.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They can be. They also have Implacable Advance, so they serve the same purpose as troops.  If you can't field them as troops, you're better off taking cheapo tactical squads to trigger interlocking tactics, rather than spend extra points to make an already overpriced unit worse (free bolter is better than a 10-point one-swing power weapon).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 points, which is better, but mandatory swords, which is worse. Still, since it doesn't say they all must swap, if you're already fielding Breachers and have some extra points left over, may as well toss in a few swords. It won't impact their ranged capability to lose a few bolters, and it may be the difference in a melee engagement (although I wonder what kind of Sv3+ unit would want to charge breachers... Dark Furies and Gal Vorbak I guess?). Bonus points if you're using Logos for max fluff over crunch, they at least get to swing them twice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

On the topic of ultramarine breachers with power swords, I struggle to see a use for them considering how much better suzerians are. Both units pretty much fulfill the same role yet suzerians do it so much better.

Are Suzerains troops?

 

 

No, but they easily can be if you take Guilliman which a lot of UM players seem to do, plus in any case as Withershow pointed out you are better off taking suzerians and cheap tactical squads to fill your troop needs instead of getting an expensive breacher unit with swords. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.