Jump to content

Welcome to The Bolter and Chainsword
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

Let's talk terminators.


  • Please log in to reply
29 replies to this topic

#26
Brother Adelard

Brother Adelard

    +FRATER DOMUS+

  • + FRATER DOMUS +
  • 484 posts
  • Faction: Black Templars
I failed a lot of charges. And yes, that one twice.

gallery_38474_6916_6036.jpg


#27
Margulix

Margulix

    +FRATER DOMUS+

  • + FRATER DOMUS +
  • 81 posts
  • Faction: Black Templars

My Assault Termies failed their charge yesterday. They then died to the kind of massed firepower that only a Guard Tank Army led by a Shadowsword can muster. (But it was still hard going to shift them.) The Vanguard vets on the other side lasted out the turn, but they were a secondary target to the Terminators, they didn't last another.

 

well in this stupid meta with mass lascannons and analogs even my LEVIAFAN dreadnought usually dies after first turn if he failes his charge from droppod. -_-


+++ No Pity. No Mercy. No Remorse. +++


#28
Medjugorje

Medjugorje

    +FRATER DOMUS+

  • + FRATER DOMUS +
  • 354 posts

Plus, Smite is situational: the OpFor has to bring a psyker and use it on the Terminators versus anything else.  AND Smite can wreck a lot more than Terminators.

 

It's not a reliable metric for a counterargument.

 

it is not if your enemies have 10 psykers on the table - and they cost exactly the same as your terminator squad. They have a meatshield and the character rule - so you have to strike down the meatshield or hide your terminators from the enemy what is clearly stupid because they just perform in close combat. Means near to the enemy and near to the guys who smite.


Edited by Medjugorje, 13 March 2018 - 01:09 PM.


#29
tvih

tvih

    +FRATER DOMUS+

  • + FRATER DOMUS +
  • 3,737 posts
  • Location:Finland
  • Faction: Black Templars / Crimson Fists

Frankly I find the whole concept of mortal wounds stupid as implemented, Smite being rather spammable just escalates that. But Smite aside most of the things that cause mortal wounds make no sense. A vehicle exploding causing wounds that can't be mitigated by armor or invulnerable, while a direct, focused and extremely powerful blast from a lascannon can be?

Units like terminators already suffer from armor-penetrating weapons, but mortal wounds just take it one step further. They're always the most problematic against units with supposedly good saves since said units generally pay through the nose for said saves. Attacks that bypassed invulnerability were rare in previous editions. I think that in the 48 games I played prior to 8th edition (yeah, I've been keeping a record) I never ended up facing such an attack on the tabletop, at least that I can recall.


  • Race Bannon and Brother Cristopher like this

#30
Marshal Wolfhart

Marshal Wolfhart

    +FRATER DOMUS+

  • + FRATER DOMUS +
  • 407 posts
  • Location:Germany
  • Faction: Black Templars

I don't think the concept of mortal wounds is the problem, it's actually a good mechanic against deathstars. The fact that every psyker, no matter the cost or skill, can have a mortal wound smite is a problem imo. I don't know why they can't just implement different shooting profiles for different psykers after a 5+ psy test. There are "babysmites" after all, like Grey Knights or Eldar Warlocks get. Would also allow for differnt purposes for offensive psykers if they got an anti horde ability, for example.


No Pity.

No Remorse.

No Fear.

 

Spoiler

BOOyh8Z.png





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users