Jump to content

Welcome to The Bolter and Chainsword
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

Catachan Vicious Traps "within terrain" rule?


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1
Wassa

Wassa

    +FRATER DOMUS+

  • + FRATER DOMUS +
  • 97 posts
  • Location:UK
  • Faction: Astra Militarum

So the strategem is:

 

AMFocus_Catachan_Boxout3rns.jpg

(taken from the warhammer community website)

 

 

 

 

What defines a terrain feature? Obviously if you're in a piece of jungle/forest terrain then that counts.

 

But a lot of battles have small rocks, walls, ruins which people hide behind and shoot out of, claiming that they benefit from a cover save.

Is it then acceptable to claim that these count as terrain features? It then gets complicated as you can get charged from behind where there is obviously no cover, but what happens with the traps?


Edited by Wassa, 16 May 2018 - 01:21 PM.


#2
walter h

walter h

    +FRATER DOMUS+

  • + FRATER DOMUS +
  • 451 posts
  • Location:Texas

First ,the enemy is assuming that they have managed to break thru your line. In truth they are behind you because you have let them. They are charging into your trap. Even when attacking from behind you are ,Catachan.ph34r.png


  • CoffeeGrunt and Wassa like this

gallery_30308_9518_48142.png


#3
duz_

duz_

    ++ REPREHENSOR FECTUM ++

  • ++ MODERATI ++
  • 3,332 posts
Doesnt the rule book define what constitutes a terrain feature?

Id suggest its anything that would interact with a model.
Eg having to move up / down or around it or modifying the units save.

Maybe discuss with your opponent beforehand particularly if you think you'll use the stratagem.

Maybe a good one for the FAQ email?
  • walter h likes this

#4
librisrouge

librisrouge

    +FRATER DOMUS+

  • + FRATER DOMUS +
  • 2,114 posts
  • Faction: Cadian 333rd, the "Half-Damned"
The rule stipulates that the Catachan unit that is WHOLLY on or within terrain. This means, to me, that it must be big enough to contain your models. If the terrain is a few scattered things, like rocks, clarify with you opponent before the game and define some boarders.
  • walter h likes this

"Frak this, for my faith is a shield proof against your blandishments."

-Book of Cain - Chapter IV, Verse XXI

 

"I think you really need to be a guard player in order to have that kind of attitude about casualties. My forces were killed to a man for slight strategic gain? All I heard was a buzzing noise until that part about strategic gain."

-Ailarian, Hand of the Kind XXXI

 

http://thisisahelmet.blogspot.com/ - My Sometimes Update Blog

 

ETL_2015_Banner_02_Custos_Fidei_03.jpg gallery_4664_11830_5080.jpg sml_gallery_29004_10691_7586.pnggallery_48988_10980_7442.png


#5
GuardDaddy

GuardDaddy

    +FRATER DOMUS+

  • + FRATER DOMUS +
  • 42 posts

wording seems pretty clear.

 

At start of game area of terrain pieces should have been defined and agreed.

 

Common examples

 

Woods - area of base of trees (if based) - or trees mark edge with straight line between them being wood boundary.

Buildings - base of terrain piece - or as is quite common with ruins in 'L' shape, a straight line across the back edges.

 

As always in a game be chatty - lso if moving or setting up just talk to your opponent "I'm setting these up in this terrain - can you confirm they are all in it" etc.

 

 

Only vague area would be barricade rule - just clarify with opponent at start... you'll probably find that reminding him that you are going to use a strategem to cause mortal woulnds when they charge you gives you more of a benefit as a pysch out than the strategem does  in game!!


  • walter h and duz_ like this




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users