Jump to content

Saga of the beast errata update


Recommended Posts

https://www.warhammer-community.com/faqs/#warhammer-40000

 

Nothing new for us in Saga. Universal obsec still on place.

 

Munitorum manual has new points for suppressor, now 33.

 

And character protection is updated to no more Bjorn/Murderfang hand holding

Edited by Rune Priest Jbickb
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Invictor gun points werent fixed

 

Stormfangs get free skyhammers

 

Any others they missed?

Are we sure skyhammers aren't meant to be free? Asking because I honestly didn't think that was an issue but am interested to here why they shouldn't be free

 

 

It is odd that dreads dont hide dreads anymore...

Edited by Rune Priest Jbickb
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Invictor gun points werent fixed

 

Stormfangs get free skyhammers

 

Any others they missed?

Are we sure skyhammers aren't meant to be free? Asking because I honestly didn't think that was an issue but am interested to here why they shouldn't be free

 

 

It is odd that dreads dont hide dreads anymore...

Sorry Stormstrikes

Basing this off an Auspex Tactics vid but I think its Stormstrikes are compulsory on Stormravens so are free. Stormfangs are the only other unit that can take them sic but they are not compulsory but are still 0 points for us

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Invictor gun points werent fixed

 

Stormfangs get free skyhammers

 

Any others they missed?

Are we sure skyhammers aren't meant to be free? Asking because I honestly didn't think that was an issue but am interested to here why they shouldn't be free

 

 

It is odd that dreads dont hide dreads anymore...

Sorry Stormstrikes

Basing this off an Auspex Tactics vid but I think its Stormstrikes are compulsory on Stormravens so are free. Stormfangs are the only other unit that can take them sic but they are not compulsory but are still 0 points for us

I guess I see the angle but I expect them to stay free especially since we are getting rolled into the same codex and its shared wargear.

 

Also Inceptors were mentioned in the other thread as being mis costed still which I had completely forgotten.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They've now had multiple opportunities to address the fact that our entire army gets Objective Secured (minus Fenrisian Wolves, Cyber Wolves, and Servitors), and still haven't made the change, so it seems pretty clear that it is, indeed, intentional.

 

Enjoy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They've now had multiple opportunities to address the fact that our entire army gets Objective Secured (minus Fenrisian Wolves, Cyber Wolves, and Servitors), and still haven't made the change, so it seems pretty clear that it is, indeed, intentional.

 

Enjoy!

Definitely agreed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Charcater targeting change means no more shield dread hiding characters either

Well, that's disheartening. I was planning on running Bjorn & Murderfang, escorted by two axe/shield ven dreads, as a separate force on the table to wreak havoc on their own. Now the Ven dreads can't even protect my normal characters either.

 

I guess my TWC went up in value though.

Edited by Axilleas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Shameless speculation and wishlisting

 

2 wound mini marines =

3 wound Wulfen

4 wound TWC

 

Hook that up to my veins

 

Where is the 2++ save for Bjorn???

 

You're not whising hard enough!!!!!!!!

 

Honestly, all dreads need to get 2+ armor saves IMO. It makes no sense their armor save is worse than TDA.

Edited by Gherrick
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the topic of the objective secured for everything, I would love for it to be intentional but GW has missed a bunch of things with their most recent updates for points and FAQs that I would put any stock in this being intentional. We will find out when the Codex release drops if they intend it but right now I wouldn't do this in your friendly games for what it's worth. Not until we get something official from GW saying that this was intended, at least. That being said, I'm not the hobby police so hobby as you want as long as everyone is having fun!

 

Edit: Grammar

Edited by The Saint Ragnar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Charcater targeting change means no more shield dread hiding characters either

Well, that's disheartening. I was planning on running Bjorn & Murderfang, escorted by two axe/shield ven dreads, as a separate force on the table to wreak havoc on their own. Now the Ven dreads can't even protect my normal characters either.

 

I guess my TWC went up in value though.

What's to say dreadnoughts aren't going to get wound increases too...

 

I'm 90% through a pretty sweet Murderfang, but certainly not buying anything till we know more. I want an oldmarine swarm with chainswords literally everywhere so it's pile of (obsolete?) shame painting time, and hope for the best. It's looking like 40k is making everyone's favourite units viable again, if you really want them. It's great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the wording change in character targeting?

Look Out, Sir

Change the first sentence to read:

‘Models cannot target a unit that contains any Character models with a Wounds characteristic of 9 or less with a ranged weapon while that unit is within 3" of any other friendly Vehicle or Monster unit with a Wounds characteristic of 10 or more, or while it is within 3" of any other friendly units that have 3 or more models, unless that Character unit is both visible to the firing model and it is the closest enemy unit to the firing model – the maelstrom of battle makes it difficult to pick out such individuals.’

 

Edit: fixed weird formatting from copy paste

Edited by Rune Priest Jbickb
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.