Hi folks,
I originally put this the TIAT thread, but it was suggested I split it out.
I was looking on Goonhammer and saw their Blunderdome write up for 40k and thought it would be an interesting thought experiment to see how it would apply to Titanicus. The premise is you try to write the worst possible army list, swap it with your opponent and you get points if the list you designed loses and if you win with the list you’ve been given.
As some rough ground rules for this little thought experiment, you have to take a legal maniple, you have to spend 1500 exactly, you can’t take equipment which does nothing and you can only spend up to 10% of a Titan’s base cost on equipment, so a Reaver can take up to 25 points of equipment. This stops people taking three Warhounds and stacking on as much gear as possible.
If people actually take part, we can vote on which is the worst list. 😂
I’ve gone with a Myrmidon.
Warlord with double volcano cannons, laser blasters, null emitters 570
Warlord with double volcano cannons, laser blasters, null emitters, hardened casing 575
Reaver with double melta, warp missile and null emitters 355
1500 on the nose, if I can add. Practically no shield stripping, Warlords will kill themselves with heat and the only weapons which can call targeted shots are on carapace of the warlords.
I haven't picked a Legio, but should be pretty easy to choose one which does literally nothing for the list.
I think it’s pretty mean.
Can you do worse?
Dallo