Inquisitor Eisenhorn

I think you're right. HOWEVER: if it were me on that battlefield, I think Dante leaving a crater where he landed would intimidate me more as an enemy, and inspire me more as a loyalist (assuming I was far enough away to survive).

These threads always make me feel like I'm missing something, I literally have no idea what the problem with the mask is, it looks fine to me! I guess I'm easy.

Love the update. Absolutely crazy how long we’ve waited for a new Dante model, or any of these 2nd edition sculpts really. Also: Very interesting promotional strategy. There is no way some warehouse worker just grabbed one of these from the wrong stack, if you ask me!

HERE WE GOOOOOOO

@ThePenitentOne All I can say is I wish you lived nearby so we could get a campaign going!

I'm increasingly embarrassed to tell people about my GW hobby, not because it's socially unacceptable, but because it's awful when they learn how much these models cost!

We’ve had this debate before my friend! All we’re saying is that GW will never make the game any of us actually want, it’s on us to make the experience of play enjoyable in whatever way is meaningful to us respectively.

Oh boy do I ever agree with this. It works if you want it to--I play these games almost entirely solo/cooperatively for the last few years. A side-effect of the pandemic isolation, and it's been a revelation!

I just use One Page Rules now. It's essentially addressed all of my issues with GW's rules model and I don't play in GW stores and so I've been actually playing 40k games above a skirmish level again! Exactly, this "open, narrative, competitive" ways of playing model is a failure because it's trying to make the game be everything to everyone. If you want to have 3 ways to play, make 3 new games for your miniatures.

I finally made it through the second season. Was surfing my phone while it was on, but checked in for any good action sequences. The end of the second season has some pretty great action sequences. I definitely didn't feel like it needs a 3rd season, it felt wrapped up enough to me. It's such a weird show to watch, because I definitely don't think I was the intended audience, but it was interesting to see such a dedicated "warrior nun" aesthetic in a show aimed at a completely demographic than myself (as in, a big 40k fan).

I agree with this. It wasn't my intent to have some major throw down about these lines when I asked for what the original content policy meant, it just seemed a little broadly defined. November's suggested edit or something similar would better reflect the intent of the site's owners as Brother Tyler has clarified on this thread and I think put to bed any good faith concerns by other board members.

Very much appreciate you being responsive to Krieg's suggestion, Brother Tyler. I was wondering if you could break down what this passage means a little more clearly--it's possible this was in the old terms too but I'd love to know what this means in practice: "You are granting us with a non-exclusive, permanent, irrevocable, unlimited license to use, publish, or re-publish your Content in connection with the Service. You retain copyright over the Content."

This is somehow the best release from GW of the year so far. Amazing focused kit!

Didn't they end up making a made-to-order concession on a few boxes a while ago that sold out too fast? I guess they only do that if enough people complain loudly enough.

Yeah I'd be curious hearing about Chambers and dice too.