-
Posts
8450 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
9
Khornestar last won the day on May 26 2023
Khornestar had the most liked content!
About Khornestar
Profile Information
-
Location
Nuclear Sky Country
-
Faction
All Things Khornate
Retained
- ++ MEDICAE MONTANEA ++
Recent Profile Visitors
Khornestar's Achievements
-
Dr_Ruminahui reacted to a post in a topic: Azrakh/current plastic Chaos Terminators/HH Terminators scale?
-
eyedrops reacted to a post in a topic: Indomitus Terminators
-
Khornestar reacted to a post in a topic: Legends of the Horus Heresy
-
Khornestar reacted to a post in a topic: Forge World Points Values
-
Khornestar reacted to a post in a topic: Forge World Points Values
-
Khornestar reacted to a post in a topic: Forge World Points Values
-
Khornestar reacted to a post in a topic: GW, YouTubers/Influencers, and Marketing Thoughts
-
Khornestar reacted to a post in a topic: GW, YouTubers/Influencers, and Marketing Thoughts
-
Khornestar reacted to a post in a topic: GW, YouTubers/Influencers, and Marketing Thoughts
-
Khornestar reacted to a post in a topic: GW, YouTubers/Influencers, and Marketing Thoughts
-
Khornestar reacted to a post in a topic: GW, YouTubers/Influencers, and Marketing Thoughts
-
Khornestar reacted to a post in a topic: GW, YouTubers/Influencers, and Marketing Thoughts
-
Lord Blacksteel reacted to a post in a topic: Munitorum Field Manual (Points)
-
Lord Blacksteel reacted to a post in a topic: Munitorum Field Manual (Points)
-
ZeroWolf reacted to a post in a topic: Munitorum Field Manual (Points)
-
MithrilForge reacted to a post in a topic: Munitorum Field Manual (Points)
-
Warden-Paints reacted to a post in a topic: Munitorum Field Manual (Points)
-
@Blurf Tried to quote but the abysmal mobile function wouldn’t let me add any text because I dared to tap outside the quote box. But regarding unplayable… to me there’s a difference between actually being unplayable and being pointed horribly. Obviously if the disparity between two armies is so great that one is guaranteed to lose, I can see why you wouldn’t want to play. Hopefully they correct such things ASAP. My comment about adapting is what I do, personally. My goal is to enjoy myself and make the best of the situation, rather than complain. Obviously that isn’t everyone else’s goal. Be mad, don’t play, not sure what to say other than I hope people find a way to deal and still enjoy the hobby.
-
Not really something to be right or wrong about, ultimately. I just kinda accept what it is and have fun with it. My enjoyment doesn’t depend on being consistent with how things were in the past, I like adapting and trying different things within a new system. Doesn't mean I don’t understand why other people are unhappy with it, but for me being adaptable is key.
-
I like it. Played my first game of 10th last night to start learning, and it was great. I like both free upgrades and fixed unit sizes fine. *shrug* They need to tweak points, but what else is new? My FLGS was packed, every table full, and everyone was excited to try out the new edition. Doesn’t mean they’re all gonna love all the changes, but there was minimal griping. All experienced players, some more competitive and some not so much (like me).
-
Wh40k 10th Edition Chaos Daemons Index
Khornestar replied to TrawlingCleaner's topic in + CHAOS DAEMONS +
Daemons of Khorne are very exciting. I like the skull altar, especially the fact it can infiltrate. That 6” shadow bubble means there’s a large base of potential 5-6” charges (depends on if the unit can take an instrument), even if you struggle controlling objectives in no man’s land. -
Wh40k 10th Edition Imperial Agents Index
Khornestar replied to TrawlingCleaner's topic in + THE IMPERIUM OF MANKIND +
The only interest here for me is Karamazov. Cool model, with the potential to make Black Templars Ld 4+ with the right vow. :D The price is absolutely bananas, even by GW standards. For an old sculpt in resin? No, GW. No. -
Wh40k 10th Edition World Eaters Index
Khornestar replied to TrawlingCleaner's topic in + WORLD EATERS +
It’s not that every entry is “too much,” and for sure the relative cost of other armies matters a lot, but just within the index itself, there are some head-scratchers. Lord of Skulls though, looks like he’s on the menu. ;) I’m not doom and gloom about it, but with reports of points going down relative to 9th, this list would indicate that is largely not the case. Maybe free upgrades will factor in for some units, but for others not so much. -
Wh40k 10th Edition World Eaters Index
Khornestar replied to TrawlingCleaner's topic in + WORLD EATERS +
These points having been making the rounds, we’ll see about them tomorrow, I guess. If true, there’s a lot of disappointment for what would have otherwise been a ton of excitement. I like the index, it has some fun and strong options inside… but these points would kill a lot of my hype. -
Nothing stopping ya! :) The swap for grav tanks is due to special snowflake multimelta option.
-
Wh40k 10th Edition Space Marine Index
Khornestar replied to Khornestar's topic in + ADEPTUS ASTARTES +
Judiciar also looks like the only source of fights first in the entire army, though I skipped all firstborn data sheets so perhaps there’s something amongst those. -
Wh40k 10th Edition Space Marine Index
Khornestar replied to Khornestar's topic in + ADEPTUS ASTARTES +
I like this; too bad the unit size has been reduced to 2, however. Still, that rule will come in handy against many targets. -
Wh40k 10th Edition Space Marine Index
Khornestar replied to Khornestar's topic in + ADEPTUS ASTARTES +
Wowsers. After having some time to digest, this is a pretty sweet army list. Certainly some head scratchers and things I’d rather they didn’t change, but so be it, the good outweighs the bad for me by a wide margin. OH THOSE POOR VANGUARD VETS! Done so dirty. Glad I never got around to building any, though I suppose I’d still consider it if there isn’t going to be a tacticus remake. I really hope the contemptors stick around and don’t end up as legends. Loving gravis. Loving gladiators, at least the lancer and reaper. Loving a lot of things. I hope the supplement-having chapters are able to have characters join the appropriate units. -
Even sooner: https://www.warhammer-community.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/uVN1M55L0U3dQeWZ.pdf
-
Wh40k 10th Edition Faction Focus: Space Marines
Khornestar replied to Lord Marshal's topic in + ADEPTUS ASTARTES +
Another 30 min or so. -
These datasheets look really cool to me. I hope my own armies leave me feeling as excited after reading through them.
-
Wh40k 10th Edition Faction Focus: Space Marines
Khornestar replied to Lord Marshal's topic in + ADEPTUS ASTARTES +
To begin with, I don’t think I’d ever rely on the GW store website to be a reliable source. They clearly didn’t get it right, it’s a work in progress, etc. And hopefully I’m not saying what you already know, but the only minimum requirement is one character. The rest of the list is totally up to you, of course then beholden to the rule of 3 or 6 for battleline. Edit: Wow a ton of replies that weren’t there suddenly appeared so I’m a bit late with my reply somehow. :P